why does megasync download slower than browser

While using Windows Explorer for uploading files, in rare instances I get an I/O error, and the copying terminates unfinished. If it's many tiny files, the delay between each file transmission makes the upload slow as molasses. If it's just one huge file it's not a factor. The result is that Windows Explorer and Roadkil copy files 2-5 times as fast as the others. The programs appear to want a confirmation that the file has been copied, which causes a delay. There seems to be a delay between each file upload, in the programs that are not Windows Explorer or Roadkil's unstoppable copier.

Downloading files as a background process can take a very long time, unless the number of files is few, so this may not always be practical. However, treating server files as if they were local requires downloading the files you are processing, as a background process. You can also use your file manipulation tools/programs, including the ones in the windows file explorer context menu, as if the files were local. This allows you to quickly browse/search for a file as if you had all of them locally. Also, you can mount the server file system as a network drive. Higher file system maintenance on devicesĪ compromise is to have all the files on the server, and sync only sets of files you use frequently. Overhead in terms of system resources (especially CPU usage for encrypted file transfers) You can sync your files to all your devices, including a copy on the file server, which provides backup with file versioning. The server takes care of backup with file versioning. You can have all your files on a server, and work with them remotely from all your devices.

Why does megasync download slower than browser